Live · updated daily 02:00 & 05:00 CET

🏛️ Government / Policy

Federal programme officer

An aggregate, source-attributed view of where activity concentrates, where public funding already flows, and where the gaps are across the ecosystem.

⚠ Public sources only. This maps observable signalling, not classified capability, and implies no completeness — an absent signal is not proof of an absent activity.

Signals for you

Descriptive patterns over the current window — each with its source evidence. Correlational, not causal.

Recent funding-related signals
141 funding-event signal(s) from 26 actor(s): ZuriQ, Swissphotonics, University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), Swiss Quantum Initiative, Miraex, Qnami ….
Regulatory-recognition activity
11 regulatory-recognition signal(s) from 7 actor(s): Quantum Technology Initiative at CERN, University of Lugano (USI), ID Quantique, Swiss Quantum Initiative, Federal Institute of Metrology (METAS), Swissphotonics.
3 signal dimension(s) have no activity this window
Dimensions with zero signals in the current window: Defense ambivalence, Defense engagement, Patents.
Signal activity is concentrated at the top
The top 3 actors (Swiss Quantum Initiative, ETH Zurich Quantum Center, Basel Precision Instruments) account for 22% of weighted signal activity across 40 active actors.

Ranked for this lens

Top actors by Cost-Weighted Signal Score — this lens's lead metric.

#ActorCategoryCost-weightedCost-Weighted Signal ScoreΣ (weight × confidence × cost_mult)The Signal Activity Score after discounting low-cost signals. Hard-to-fake signals (patents, funding, peer-reviewed research) keep most of their weight; low-cost positioning is multiplied down.ActivitySignal Activity ScoreΣ (weight × confidence)How much an observer should update their view of an actor, summed over every signal. Weight is the dimension's importance; confidence is how sure the classifier is the signal is real.Low-costLow-Cost Signal Sharelow_cost / totalShare of an actor's signals that are low-cost and hard to verify — claims that are easy to make. A high share means positioning is substituting for evidence.
1Swiss Quantum InitiativeNational initiative66.7281.440%
2ETH Zurich Quantum CenterUniversity / research hub61.1078.650%
3Basel Precision InstrumentsPrivate company49.4366.700%
4Basel Quantum Center at the University of BaselUniversity / research hub47.6364.860%
5Swiss Nanoscience InstituteUniversity / research hub42.9654.820%
6National Centre for Competence in Research SPINNational initiative38.2554.170%
7Quantum Science and Engineering Center at EPFLUniversity / research hub30.4340.860%
8Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI)University / research hub28.9337.790%

Full leaderboard →

This lens re-orders and frames the same source-attributed signals — it derives no new data and makes no recommendation. See methodology.